H.R.1832 - To establish Golden Sea Bream as an acceptable market name for Stenotomus chrysops. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1832 aims to legally establish "Golden Sea Bream" as an acceptable market name for the fish species Stenotomus chrysops. This bill prevents the labeling or marketing of this fish under the specified name from being considered misbranded or adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Magaziner and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to provide legal clarity and consistency in the marketing and labeling of Stenotomus chrysops. This would allow the fishing industry and retailers to use the name "Golden Sea Bream" without fear of legal repercussions under existing food and drug regulations. Ultimately, this could influence consumer perception and marketability of the fish.
Potential Benefits
- Simplifies marketing and labeling for the fishing industry.
- Potentially increases consumer appeal and demand for Stenotomus chrysops.
- Reduces legal uncertainty for businesses selling this fish.
- May lead to better price points for fishermen.
- Could streamline interstate commerce of this particular species.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May mislead consumers if "Golden Sea Bream" does not accurately reflect the fish's characteristics.
- Could create confusion if other species are similarly marketed.
- Minimal impact on broader economic or social issues.
- Potential for unintended consequences related to fisheries management, though unlikely.
- The bill does not address any environmental concerns.
Constitutional Alignment
This bill appears to align with the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) of the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. By standardizing the market name for a fish species, the bill facilitates trade and reduces potential barriers related to labeling and marketing. There are no apparent conflicts with other constitutional provisions or amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).