H.R.1836 - Granting Remaining Applications Not Treated Efficiently or Delayed Act of 2025; GRANTED Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1836, the GRANTED Act of 2025, aims to expedite the approval process for federal easements, rights-of-way, or leases related to communications facility installations. It amends the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, stipulating that applications not granted or denied by a specified deadline are automatically deemed granted. This bill seeks to streamline the deployment of communications infrastructure by setting clear timelines and consequences for agency inaction.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill will be to accelerate the deployment of communications infrastructure, such as cell towers and broadband networks. By imposing a deadline for application review and approval, the bill incentivizes executive agencies to process requests more efficiently. This could lead to faster expansion of broadband access and improved wireless communication services.
Potential Benefits
- Faster deployment of communication infrastructure: The bill ensures timely decisions on applications, reducing delays in deploying new technologies.
- Increased investment in broadband and wireless: Streamlined approval processes can attract more investment in communication infrastructure.
- Improved connectivity for rural areas: Faster deployment can extend broadband and wireless services to underserved areas.
- Economic growth: Enhanced communication infrastructure supports economic activity and innovation.
- Reduced bureaucratic hurdles: The bill simplifies the application process, reducing administrative burdens.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for inadequate review: Expedited timelines may lead to insufficient scrutiny of applications, potentially overlooking environmental or community concerns.
- Risk of poorly planned infrastructure: Rushing approvals could result in suboptimal placement or design of communication facilities.
- Reduced local control: The deemed-granted provision could override local zoning regulations or community input.
- Possible environmental impacts: Inadequate review may lead to unintended environmental consequences.
- Increased workload on agencies: Agencies may struggle to meet deadlines, leading to errors or inconsistent decisions.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution is generally positive, as it aims to promote interstate commerce by facilitating the deployment of communication infrastructure. Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause). However, concerns could arise if the expedited approval process infringes upon states' rights or private property rights without due process (Fifth Amendment). The bill does not appear to violate any specific constitutional provision, but its implementation must respect constitutional limits on federal power and protect individual rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).