H.R.1918 - Farewell to Foam Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1918, the Farewell to Foam Act of 2025, aims to prohibit the sale and distribution of expanded polystyrene (EPS) food service ware, loose fill, and coolers in the United States. The bill defines key terms such as "covered polystyrene foam ware," "distributor," "food service provider," and "manufacturer" to clarify the scope of the ban. The Act sets a deadline of January 1, 2028, for compliance.
The bill outlines enforcement mechanisms, including written notifications for first violations and civil penalties for subsequent violations. Penalties range from $250 to $1,000, with limitations based on the annual revenue of the violating entity. The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is authorized to permit states to carry out enforcement and to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the Act.
This bill reflects a congressional effort to reduce plastic pollution and promote the use of more environmentally friendly alternatives in the food service and packaging industries.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be the elimination of expanded polystyrene products in food service and packaging. Businesses would need to switch to alternative materials for these purposes. This could lead to changes in consumer behavior and potentially affect the cost of goods and services.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced environmental pollution from polystyrene waste.
- Encouragement of the use of more sustainable and biodegradable alternatives.
- Potential reduction in health risks associated with polystyrene chemicals leaching into food and beverages.
- Improved aesthetics in public spaces due to less polystyrene litter.
- Stimulation of innovation in the development of eco-friendly packaging solutions.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased costs for businesses due to the need to switch to more expensive alternative materials.
- Potential job losses in the polystyrene manufacturing industry.
- Possible inconvenience for consumers if alternative packaging is less effective or more cumbersome.
- Potential for increased reliance on other types of plastics, which may have their own environmental impacts.
- Enforcement costs for the EPA and participating states.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as it aims to protect the environment and public health. Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce, which includes the sale and distribution of goods, as outlined in Article I, Section 8. The enforcement mechanisms outlined in the bill, including civil penalties, are within the powers granted to Congress. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or freedoms.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).