H.R.1929 - Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act of 2025; JUDGES Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1929, the JUDGES Act of 2025, aims to address understaffing in U.S. District Courts by authorizing additional judgeships. The bill proposes a phased increase in the number of district judges across various districts from 2029 to 2039. It also includes provisions for temporary judgeships and requires GAO reports on judicial caseloads and detention space needs.
Expected Effects
The bill's passage would lead to an increase in the number of federal district judges, potentially reducing caseloads and delays in the judicial system. The phased implementation allows for a gradual increase in judicial capacity over time. The bill also mandates greater transparency regarding the Judicial Conference's recommendations for judgeships.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced caseloads for existing judges, leading to more efficient handling of cases.
- Faster resolution of legal disputes for individuals and businesses.
- Improved access to justice, particularly in districts with high population growth.
- Increased transparency in the judicial appointment process through public reporting.
- Addresses the growing backlog of cases in district courts.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased government spending due to the salaries and support staff required for the new judgeships.
- Potential for political considerations to influence the appointment of new judges.
- The phased implementation may not immediately address existing backlogs.
- The temporary judgeships may create uncertainty regarding long-term judicial capacity.
- The cost of inflation adjustments may be difficult to predict.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to establish inferior courts and determine the number of judges. The appointments are subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, as outlined in Article II, Section 2. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or freedoms.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).