H.R.1933 - James Earl Jones Congressional Gold Medal Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.1933, the James Earl Jones Congressional Gold Medal Act, proposes to posthumously award a Congressional Gold Medal to James Earl Jones. This is in recognition of his contributions to film and theatre, his role in reshaping perceptions, dismantling racial barriers, and advocating for equal opportunities. The bill outlines findings regarding Jones' life and career, authorizes the striking of the medal, and specifies its presentation to his son.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill will result in the creation and presentation of a Congressional Gold Medal to James Earl Jones' son. It will also allow for the sale of bronze duplicates to the public. This action serves as a formal recognition of Jones' achievements and impact on American culture.
Potential Benefits
- Recognition of Artistic Achievement: Honors James Earl Jones' significant contributions to the performing arts.
- Symbolic Importance: Reinforces the value of diversity and inclusion in the arts.
- Educational Value: Highlights Jones' life story as an example of overcoming adversity and achieving excellence.
- Boost to Cultural Pride: Celebrates an American icon and his impact on national identity.
- Potential Revenue: Sales of bronze duplicates could generate revenue for the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Cost to Taxpayers: The striking of the gold medal will incur costs, although these are authorized to be charged against the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
- Potential for Political Divisiveness: While unlikely in this case, any award can be subject to political debate or disagreement.
- Opportunity Cost: Resources spent on this could be allocated to other programs or initiatives.
- Risk of Trivialization: Overuse of such awards could diminish their significance.
- Noneconomic Impact: The bill does not address any pressing economic issues.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the spirit of the Constitution, particularly the goal of promoting the general welfare by recognizing and celebrating significant contributions to American culture. While the Constitution does not explicitly address commemorative awards, this action falls within the implied powers of Congress to legislate on matters of national importance and to support the arts. The bill does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).