H.R.2047 - Pink Tariffs Study Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2047, the "Pink Tariffs Study Act," directs the Secretary of the Treasury to conduct a study on whether U.S. tariff rates are regressive or exhibit gender bias. The study must analyze the burden of tariffs on consumers, considering factors like mass-market vs. luxury goods and differences in tariffs on men's and women's clothing. The study also requires a disaggregation of these effects based on gender, household type, and income level.
The bill aims to identify potential inequalities in the tariff system. The results of the study are to be submitted to Congress within one year of the Act's enactment.
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 11, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.2047 would lead to a comprehensive study of U.S. tariff rates, potentially revealing regressive or gender-biased impacts. This could lead to future legislative action to reform tariff policies.
The study's findings could inform policy decisions aimed at making the tariff system fairer and more equitable. This could result in adjustments to tariff rates on specific goods.
Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that tariffs do not disproportionately burden certain consumer groups.
Potential Benefits
- Provides data-driven insights into the fairness and equity of the U.S. tariff system.
- Could lead to the identification and correction of regressive or gender-biased tariff policies.
- May result in a more equitable distribution of the burden of tariffs across different consumer groups.
- Informs policymakers about the potential unintended consequences of tariff policies.
- Promotes transparency and accountability in the tariff-setting process.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- The study itself incurs costs to taxpayers.
- The study may not lead to any actual policy changes, even if biases are identified.
- The one-year timeframe for the study may be insufficient for a comprehensive analysis.
- The study's findings could be politicized or misinterpreted.
- The focus on tariffs may divert attention from other factors contributing to economic inequality.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to lay and collect duties, imposts, and excises. The study mandated by the bill is an exercise of Congress's oversight function related to its power to regulate commerce.
There are no apparent conflicts with individual rights or liberties protected by the Bill of Rights. The bill does not infringe upon freedom of speech, religion, or any other constitutionally protected right.
Furthermore, the bill's focus on fairness and equity aligns with the broader constitutional goal of promoting the general welfare.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).