H.R.207 - Supporting the Health of Aquatic systems through Research Knowledge and Enhanced Dialogue Act of 2025; SHARKED Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 207, also known as the SHARKED Act of 2025, directs the Secretary of Commerce to establish a task force to address shark depredation. The task force will include representatives from various fishery management councils, marine fisheries commissions, state fish and wildlife agencies, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and experts in shark management, behavior, and ecology. The act also amends the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to include research projects focused on understanding and addressing shark depredation.
Expected Effects
The establishment of the Shark Depredation Task Force will lead to increased research and coordination regarding shark depredation issues. This includes identifying causes, developing management strategies, and creating educational materials for the fishing community. Ultimately, this aims to reduce harmful interactions between sharks and humans while maintaining healthy shark populations.
Potential Benefits
- Improved understanding of shark behavior and interactions with humans.
- Development of strategies to minimize harmful interactions between sharks and humans.
- Enhanced coordination and communication among fisheries management and research communities.
- Support for healthy shark populations and their role in the ocean ecosystem.
- Inclusion of shark depredation research projects under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential costs associated with establishing and maintaining the task force and research projects.
- Possible conflicts between different stakeholders (e.g., fishermen, conservationists, researchers) regarding management strategies.
- The task force's recommendations may not be fully implemented or effective in addressing shark depredation.
- The sunset clause may limit the long-term impact of the task force's work.
- Potential for increased regulation on fishing activities.
Constitutional Alignment
The SHARKED Act appears to align with the US Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce, including fisheries management. The Act's focus on research and management strategies related to shark depredation falls within the scope of Congress's authority to enact laws necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. There are no apparent conflicts with individual liberties or states' rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).