H.R.209 - Inaction Has Consequences Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 209, the "Inaction Has Consequences Act," proposes holding the salaries of Members of Congress in escrow if either the House or Senate fails to pass regular appropriation bills by the first day of the fiscal year. This measure aims to incentivize timely budget approvals. The bill defines 'regular appropriation bill' and outlines the process for administering the escrow account, including the role of the Secretary of the Treasury.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to create a financial disincentive for Congressional inaction on appropriation bills. This could lead to more timely budget approvals. Ultimately, this could reduce the likelihood of government shutdowns.
Potential Benefits
- Could incentivize Congress to pass appropriation bills on time, avoiding government shutdowns.
- May lead to a more stable and predictable budget process.
- Could improve public trust in government by demonstrating accountability.
- Could reduce the negative economic impacts associated with government shutdowns.
- Could encourage more bipartisan cooperation in the budget process.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could create a perverse incentive for Congress to pass appropriation bills quickly without proper deliberation.
- May disproportionately affect Members of Congress who rely on their salaries.
- Could be seen as a symbolic gesture without addressing the underlying causes of Congressional gridlock.
- Could lead to increased political polarization if one party perceives the bill as targeting them.
- The bill's effectiveness is dependent on the willingness of Congress to comply with its provisions.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is primarily linked to Article I, Section 6, which addresses the compensation of Senators and Representatives. The Twenty-seventh Amendment, preventing laws varying the compensation for the services of Senators and Representatives from taking effect until an election of Representatives has intervened, is explicitly addressed in Section 4 of the bill, ensuring compliance. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any other constitutional provisions.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).