H.R.2090 - Identifying Potential Terrorist at the Border Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2090, the "Identifying Potential Terrorist at the Border Act of 2025," amends Section 236A of the Immigration and Nationality Act. It mandates that the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection cross-reference the names of all aliens entering the country with the federal terrorist screening database. This cross-referencing must occur before an alien is released from custody.
Expected Effects
The bill aims to enhance national security by preventing individuals on the terrorist screening database from entering the United States. This will likely lead to increased scrutiny and potential delays for individuals seeking entry. It may also result in more detentions at the border while cross-referencing is completed.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced national security by potentially preventing terrorists from entering the country.
- Provides law enforcement with an additional tool to identify potential threats.
- May deter individuals with terrorist ties from attempting to enter the U.S.
- Could lead to improved border security measures and protocols.
- Potentially strengthens international cooperation on counter-terrorism efforts.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased delays and backlogs at border crossings.
- Risk of misidentification and wrongful detention of individuals.
- Possible violation of privacy rights and civil liberties.
- Increased burden on Customs and Border Protection resources.
- Potential for diplomatic tensions if the process is not handled transparently and fairly.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is complex. While the government has a legitimate interest in national security and border control, the bill could potentially infringe upon individual liberties and due process rights, particularly if the terrorist screening database contains errors or is used improperly. The Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees due process, are relevant here. The government would need to demonstrate a compelling interest and ensure that the screening process is narrowly tailored to avoid infringing upon constitutional rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).