H.R.2189 - Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2189, the Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act of 2025, aims to modernize federal firearms laws by accounting for advancements in less-than-lethal weapon technology. The bill seeks to exempt certain less-than-lethal projectile devices from restrictions under Title 18 of the United States Code. It defines 'less-than-lethal projectile device' and establishes a process for the Attorney General to determine whether a device meets this definition.
Expected Effects
The bill's passage would likely lead to increased use of less-than-lethal weapons by law enforcement. This could reduce fatalities and serious injuries during encounters between law enforcement and civilians. It also establishes a clear legal framework for these devices.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced fatalities: By promoting less-than-lethal options, the bill could decrease the number of fatal encounters between law enforcement and the public.
- Modernized laws: Updates firearms laws to reflect technological advancements.
- Clear definitions: Provides a legal definition for 'less-than-lethal projectile device,' reducing ambiguity.
- Increased safety for law enforcement: Provides law enforcement with more tools to de-escalate situations.
- Accountability: The Attorney General's review process adds a layer of accountability for these devices.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for misuse: Less-than-lethal weapons could still cause injury or be misused.
- Lack of comprehensive regulation: The bill focuses narrowly on projectile devices and may not address other less-than-lethal technologies.
- Unintended consequences: Broadening the definition of acceptable weapons could lead to unforeseen legal challenges.
- Potential for escalation: Over-reliance on these devices could lead to escalation in certain situations.
- Limited scope: The bill does not address broader issues of police reform or training.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Second Amendment by not infringing on the right to bear arms, as it focuses on less-than-lethal alternatives. It also aligns with the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) as it regulates interstate commerce of these devices. The Attorney General's review process could be seen as an exercise of executive power, which is constitutionally permissible.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).