H.R.2208 - Saving NSF’s Workforce Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2208, the "Saving NSF's Workforce Act," proposes a moratorium on reductions in force (RIF) at the National Science Foundation (NSF) until full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2026 are enacted. The bill aims to prevent involuntary separations of NSF employees in various service categories, except in cases of misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 18, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Expected Effects
The immediate effect would be to stabilize the NSF workforce by preventing layoffs and involuntary separations. This could lead to greater job security for NSF employees. The long-term impact depends on the appropriations for fiscal year 2026 and beyond, and whether the moratorium is extended or made permanent.
Potential Benefits
- Job Security: Prevents NSF employees from being laid off, providing job security.
- Continuity of Operations: Ensures the NSF can continue its operations without disruption from workforce reductions.
- Employee Morale: Boosts employee morale by removing the threat of job loss.
- Preservation of Expertise: Retains experienced staff, preserving institutional knowledge and expertise within the NSF.
- Attract and Retain Talent: Makes the NSF a more attractive employer, aiding in attracting and retaining skilled professionals.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Inefficiency: May prevent the NSF from streamlining its workforce and improving efficiency.
- Budgetary Constraints: Could strain the NSF's budget if it is forced to retain employees it cannot afford.
- Limited Flexibility: Reduces the NSF's flexibility in managing its workforce and responding to changing priorities.
- Possible Stagnation: May lead to stagnation if underperforming employees are protected from separation.
- Delayed Innovation: Could delay innovation if the NSF is unable to bring in new talent or restructure its workforce.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to provide for the general Welfare of the United States. Supporting scientific research and development through the NSF can be seen as promoting the general welfare. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations. The power to appropriate funds and set policy for government agencies falls within the legislative authority granted to Congress.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).