H.R.2215 - Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2215, the Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act, redesignates the Salem Maritime National Historic Site as the "Salem Maritime National Historical Park." It also mandates a boundary study to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of including additional sites related to maritime, coastal defense, and military history within the park. The study area includes Salem, Massachusetts, and its vicinity, including the Salem Armory Visitor Center building and adjacent Salem Armory Park.
Expected Effects
The Act will change the name of the historic site and initiate a study that could lead to an expansion of the park's boundaries. This may result in increased tourism and federal protection of additional historical sites. The Secretary of the Interior is required to submit a report on the study's findings to relevant congressional committees.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced preservation of maritime, coastal defense, and military history.
- Potential increase in tourism to Salem, Massachusetts.
- Possible expansion of the National Park System to include additional historical sites.
- Increased federal recognition and protection of cultural resources.
- Stimulation of local economy through tourism and related activities.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased federal oversight and regulation of private property within the expanded park boundaries.
- Costs associated with conducting the boundary study and potential land acquisition.
- Possible displacement of residents or businesses if the park expands significantly.
- Potential for increased traffic and congestion in the Salem area due to increased tourism.
- Possible delays in the study and implementation due to funding constraints or bureaucratic hurdles.
Constitutional Alignment
This Act appears to align with the Constitution, particularly the implied power of Congress to manage and protect federal lands and historical sites. The establishment and maintenance of national parks can be seen as promoting the general welfare, as mentioned in the Preamble. The Act does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).