H.R.2215 - Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2215, the Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act, seeks to redesignate the Salem Maritime National Historic Site as the "Salem Maritime National Historical Park." It also mandates a boundary study to assess the feasibility of including additional sites related to maritime, coastal defense, and military history within the park. The study area includes Salem, Massachusetts, and its vicinity, specifically the Salem Armory Visitor Center building and adjacent Salem Armory Park.
Expected Effects
The bill's passage would lead to a formal name change for the historic site. More significantly, the boundary study could result in an expansion of the park's boundaries, potentially incorporating new historical sites and resources. This expansion could lead to increased tourism and federal involvement in the area's historical preservation.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced recognition and preservation of Salem's maritime, coastal defense, and military history.
- Potential for increased tourism and economic activity in Salem.
- Federal resources allocated to the study and potentially to the park's expansion and maintenance.
- Improved understanding and interpretation of the area's historical significance.
- Potential for increased community engagement in historical preservation efforts.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased federal oversight and regulation of private property within the expanded park boundaries.
- Costs associated with the boundary study and potential park expansion, borne by taxpayers.
- Possible conflicts between preservation efforts and local development interests.
- Potential disruption to existing land use and activities within the study area.
- The study may not lead to any tangible benefits if the findings are unfavorable.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the Constitution through Congress's power to legislate for the general welfare (Article I, Section 8). The establishment and maintenance of national parks can be seen as promoting the general welfare by preserving historical sites and providing recreational opportunities. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).