H.R.2323 - Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2323, the Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment Act, proposes to adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in Texas. It allows the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 6,100 acres of land or interests in land for inclusion in the park, specifically through donation or exchange, not eminent domain. The bill also mandates the Secretary to revise the park's boundary upon acquisition and administer the new land as part of the park.
Expected Effects
The bill, if enacted, would expand Big Bend National Park by approximately 6,100 acres. This expansion aims to enhance conservation efforts and potentially improve recreational opportunities within the park. The prohibition of eminent domain ensures that land acquisition relies on voluntary transactions.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced Conservation: Protecting additional land within the park can preserve biodiversity and natural resources.
- Recreational Opportunities: Expanding the park may lead to increased opportunities for hiking, camping, and other outdoor activities.
- Economic Benefits: Increased tourism related to the expanded park could benefit local communities.
- Preservation of Natural Beauty: Protecting the land ensures the continued enjoyment of the area's natural beauty for future generations.
- Voluntary Land Transactions: The prohibition of eminent domain respects private property rights.
Potential Disadvantages
- Limited Scope: The bill relies on donation or exchange, which may limit the speed and extent of land acquisition.
- Potential for Disputes: Land exchanges can sometimes be complex and lead to disputes over valuation.
- Administrative Costs: Managing the expanded park area will incur additional administrative costs for the National Park Service.
- Impact on Local Land Use: Changes in land ownership may affect local land use patterns and property values.
- Uncertainty of Acquisition: The bill's success depends on landowners' willingness to donate or exchange their land.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the US Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate and administer federal lands. The prohibition of eminent domain in this specific case also aligns with the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which requires just compensation for private property taken for public use; however, this bill avoids that issue by precluding condemnation. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).