H.R.2395 - Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today Act; SHORT Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2395, the "Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today Act" or "SHORT Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and Title 18 of the United States Code to remove short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and certain other weapons from the definition of firearms under the National Firearms Act (NFA). This would alter the regulatory landscape for these weapons. The bill also aims to eliminate disparate treatment of short-barreled rifles and shotguns used for lawful purposes and preempt certain state laws related to these weapons.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.2395 would significantly reduce federal regulation and taxation on short-barreled rifles and shotguns, treating them more like standard rifles and shotguns. This could lead to increased ownership and use of these weapons. The preemption of certain state laws would standardize regulations across the country, potentially easing burdens on owners but also limiting state control.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced costs and burdens for owners of short-barreled rifles and shotguns due to the elimination of NFA requirements.
- Simplification of regulations across state lines, making it easier for individuals to transport these weapons legally.
- Potential increase in the availability of these weapons for self-defense and sporting purposes.
- Removal of certain weapons from the NFA registry, reducing government oversight.
- May allow for innovation in firearm design without the constraints of the NFA.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential increase in gun violence due to easier access to short-barreled rifles and shotguns.
- Erosion of state authority to regulate firearms within their borders.
- Possible difficulties for law enforcement in tracking and regulating these weapons.
- Concerns that the removal of NFA restrictions could lead to misuse of these weapons.
- May create a loophole for criminals to acquire more dangerous weapons.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Second Amendment is a central consideration. Proponents argue it strengthens the right to bear arms by reducing restrictions on certain firearms. Opponents may argue that it undermines public safety regulations, which are also within the purview of legitimate government action. The preemption of state laws raises questions about federalism and the balance of power between the federal government and the states, potentially implicating the Tenth Amendment.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).