H.R.2397 - Targeting TANF to Families in Need Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2397, the "Targeting TANF to Families in Need Act," aims to amend Title IV of the Social Security Act. The proposed change would restrict Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds to families with incomes less than twice the federal poverty guidelines. This bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill would be to narrow the eligibility criteria for TANF benefits. States would be required to ensure that TANF funds are only used to assist families whose income falls below the specified threshold. This could lead to some families currently receiving TANF benefits becoming ineligible.
Potential Benefits
- More Focused Assistance: Directs resources towards the most impoverished families.
- Potential for Increased Benefit Amounts: With a smaller pool of recipients, individual benefits could potentially increase.
- Reduced Program Waste: May eliminate assistance to families who are not truly in need.
- Incentive to Reduce Dependence: Could encourage families to seek employment and increase income to remain eligible.
Potential Disadvantages
- Exclusion of Some Needy Families: Families slightly above the income threshold may still struggle but lose access to TANF.
- Increased Administrative Burden: States may face challenges in verifying income and adjusting eligibility.
- Potential for Reduced Overall Impact: Limiting the scope of TANF could reduce its overall effectiveness in poverty reduction.
- Disproportionate Impact: Certain demographics or geographic areas may be disproportionately affected by the stricter eligibility criteria.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the general welfare clause of the Constitution (Preamble). It falls under Congress's power to legislate for the general welfare by providing assistance to families in need. However, the specific income threshold and its implementation are policy choices subject to debate and do not directly implicate specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).