H.R.2451 - Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2451, the Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025, directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River in Massachusetts and Vermont. The study will assess the river's suitability for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The bill specifies that the study should include the North, South, East, and West Branches of the Deerfield River, as well as major tributaries.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill will initiate a comprehensive study of the Deerfield River and its tributaries. The study's findings will inform Congress's decision on whether to designate the river as a Wild and Scenic River. Such designation could lead to increased environmental protections and recreational opportunities.
Potential Benefits
- Environmental Protection: Potential for enhanced protection of the Deerfield River's ecosystem.
- Recreational Opportunities: Increased tourism and recreational activities such as fishing, hiking, and boating.
- Conservation: Preservation of the river's natural and cultural resources.
- Economic Benefits: Potential for increased property values and local business revenue due to tourism.
- Public Awareness: Increased awareness of the importance of river conservation.
Potential Disadvantages
- Land Use Restrictions: Potential restrictions on private property development along the river.
- Economic Impact: Possible negative impact on industries that rely on the river for resources, such as logging or energy production.
- Government Oversight: Increased government regulation and oversight of the river and surrounding areas.
- Study Costs: The cost of conducting the study itself, which could be a burden on taxpayers.
- Local Opposition: Potential opposition from local communities or landowners concerned about federal intervention.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the US Constitution through Congress's power to regulate navigable waters and manage federal lands, as implied by the Property Clause (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2) and the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The study itself does not infringe on individual rights, but subsequent designation and regulations could raise constitutional questions related to property rights (Fifth Amendment).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).