H.R.2608 - To remove certain species from the lists of threatened species and endangered species published pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2608 proposes to remove several species, including the Arabian oryx, Banteng, Eld's brow-antlered deer, Grevy's zebra, Red lechwe, Seledang, and Swamp deer, from the lists of threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The bill also restricts the Secretary's ability to designate the Bukharan markhor as threatened or endangered.
The bill is sponsored by Mr. Roy and Mr. Pfluger and was introduced in the House of Representatives, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
The justification for the delisting is not provided in the bill, but it implies a belief that these species no longer require the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R. 2608 would remove federal protections for the listed species, potentially impacting their conservation status and habitat management.
This could lead to increased hunting or habitat development in areas where these species are found.
Furthermore, it could set a precedent for delisting other species based on political considerations rather than scientific evidence.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces regulatory burdens associated with land use and development in areas inhabited by these species.
- Could free up resources within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to focus on other species more critically in need of protection.
- May reflect successful conservation efforts that have led to the recovery of these species (though this is not stated in the bill).
- Could streamline bureaucratic processes related to species management.
- May align with local or regional economic development goals.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to population declines or even extinction of the delisted species if their recovery is not yet secure.
- May negatively impact biodiversity and ecosystem health.
- Could undermine the integrity and effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act.
- May face opposition from environmental groups and concerned citizens.
- Could set a negative precedent for delisting species based on political pressure rather than scientific evidence.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill falls under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) as it relates to regulating wildlife and natural resources, which can have economic impacts. Congress has the power to enact laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers.
However, the bill's potential impact on biodiversity and environmental protection could raise questions about the government's responsibility to promote the general welfare, as stated in the Preamble of the Constitution.
There are no apparent violations of individual rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).