H.R.2700 - Utilize No Phones in Learning to Unleash Growth in Grades and Educate Distraction-free Act of 2025; UNPLUGGED Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2700, the UNPLUGGED Act of 2025, aims to require State educational agencies to implement policies prohibiting the use or possession of personal mobile phones by students in public school classrooms during school hours. The bill cites findings that excessive mobile phone use impairs educational environments and negatively impacts student attention, academic performance, and mental health. It mandates that states, in coordination with local agencies, establish and enforce these policies, while allowing for exceptions for medical needs, disabilities, and English learners.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would lead to a nationwide shift in how schools manage student mobile phone use. States would be required to create and enforce policies restricting phone access during school hours. The bill also authorizes a grant program to help states implement secure storage methods for these devices.
Potential Benefits
- Improved student focus and academic performance.
- Reduced classroom distractions and disruptions.
- Enhanced mental health and well-being among students.
- Decreased rates of bullying and cyber harassment.
- More effective educational environments.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential infringement on student autonomy and personal freedom.
- Logistical challenges for schools in implementing and enforcing the policy.
- Possible difficulties for parents in contacting their children during emergencies.
- Increased costs for schools to provide secure storage solutions.
- Concerns about equitable access to technology for students who rely on phones for educational support.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. While it doesn't directly violate any specific constitutional right, arguments could be made regarding the right to privacy or freedom of expression, though these are generally limited in the context of public schools. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, raising questions about the federal government mandating specific educational policies. However, the grant program authorized in the bill could be seen as an incentive rather than a mandate, potentially mitigating these concerns.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).