H.R.2734 - Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2734, the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act, aims to amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 by adding approximately 6,817 acres of land within the Routt National Forest to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. This addition is depicted on a map dated February 26, 2024, titled 'Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition Proposal'. The bill also addresses tribal rights and the management of fire, insects, and diseases within the expanded wilderness area.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is an expansion of the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, providing increased protection for the designated land. This could lead to enhanced conservation efforts and recreational opportunities. It also clarifies the management responsibilities of the Secretary of Agriculture and ensures the preservation of tribal rights and traditional uses.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced Conservation: Protects an additional 6,817 acres of land within the Routt National Forest.
- Recreational Opportunities: May increase opportunities for outdoor recreation such as hiking and camping.
- Tribal Access: Preserves tribal rights and allows for traditional uses of the land by Indian Tribes.
- Wilderness Management: Provides guidelines for managing fire, insects, and diseases within the expanded wilderness area.
- Clarification of Responsibilities: Clearly defines the Secretary of Agriculture's role in administering the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Restrictions: May impose restrictions on certain activities within the expanded wilderness area, such as logging or resource extraction.
- Administrative Costs: Could incur additional administrative costs for managing the expanded wilderness area.
- Limited Economic Activity: May limit economic activities in the designated area, potentially affecting local communities.
- Fire Management Challenges: Managing fire, insects, and diseases in wilderness areas can be complex and costly.
- Possible Conflicts: Potential conflicts between different user groups (e.g., recreational users, tribal members, conservationists).
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the US Constitution through Congress's power to manage federal lands, as outlined in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, also known as the Property Clause. The bill also respects treaty rights of Indian Tribes, which are recognized under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI). The designation of wilderness areas and the management of natural resources fall within the scope of federal authority.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).