H.R.276 - Gulf of America Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.276, the "Gulf of America Act," proposes renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America." The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior, through the Chairman of the Board on Geographic Names, to oversee the implementation of this renaming in federal documents and maps. Federal agencies would be required to update their documents and maps within 180 days of the Act's enactment.
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 9, 2025, and reported with an amendment on April 30, 2025. It was then committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed.
The bill's primary action is purely symbolic, focusing on changing the name of a geographic feature.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the bill would change all references to the Gulf of Mexico in U.S. laws, maps, regulations, documents, and other records to "Gulf of America". This would require federal agencies to update their official materials to reflect the new name.
The immediate effect would be administrative, involving the updating of government documents. The long-term effect would depend on public adoption of the new name.
Potential Benefits
- Potential boost to national identity: Some may view the renaming as a way to strengthen the connection between the United States and the Gulf.
- Increased awareness: The renaming could draw more attention to the Gulf and its importance to the U.S.
- Symbolic value: The name change could be seen as a symbol of American ownership and pride.
- Potential for tourism: A new name might attract tourists, although this is speculative.
- Sense of unity: The renaming could foster a greater sense of national unity.
Potential Disadvantages
- Administrative burden: Federal agencies would incur costs and time updating documents and maps.
- Confusion and resistance: The public may resist using the new name, leading to confusion.
- Lack of practical impact: The renaming does not address any real issues affecting the Gulf, such as environmental concerns or economic challenges.
- Potential for controversy: Some may view the renaming as unnecessary or disrespectful to the region's history and culture.
- Waste of resources: The resources spent on renaming could be used for more pressing issues.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to be constitutionally permissible. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws regarding federal property and regulations. Renaming a geographic feature falls under this broad authority.
There are no apparent violations of individual rights or freedoms as protected by the Bill of Rights. The act does not infringe upon freedom of speech, religion, or any other constitutionally protected right.
However, the constitutionality does not guarantee the bill's necessity or wisdom.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).