H.R.2768 - Benton MacKaye National Scenic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2768, the Benton MacKaye National Scenic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025, directs the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Benton MacKaye Trail as a national scenic trail. The bill highlights the trail's scenic beauty, biodiversity, and recreational opportunities across Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina. It emphasizes the trail's accessibility, existing maintenance, and potential economic benefits for rural communities.
Expected Effects
The bill, if enacted, would initiate a feasibility study to determine if the Benton MacKaye Trail should be designated as a national scenic trail. This study could lead to increased federal recognition and potential funding for the trail. Ultimately, this could enhance the trail's preservation and recreational value.
Potential Benefits
- Increased recognition and potential federal funding for the Benton MacKaye Trail.
- Enhanced preservation of the trail's natural resources and scenic beauty.
- Promotion of outdoor recreation and tourism in the region.
- Potential economic benefits for rural communities along the trail.
- Improved access and maintenance of the trail for public use.
Potential Disadvantages
- The feasibility study itself will require government resources and funding.
- Designation as a national scenic trail could lead to increased regulation and restrictions on land use.
- Potential for increased tourism to negatively impact the trail's environment if not managed properly.
- The study may conclude that the trail is not suitable for national scenic trail designation, rendering the effort moot.
- Possible conflicts with existing land use agreements or private property rights along the trail.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the US Constitution, particularly the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8), which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states, including activities that affect interstate tourism and recreation. Additionally, the Property Clause (Article IV, Section 3) gives Congress the power to manage federal lands, which constitute a significant portion of the trail's route. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any individual rights or liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).