H.R.2846 - To amend title II of the Public Health Service Act to include as an additional right or privilege of commissioned officers of the Public Health Service (and their beneficiaries) certain leave provided under title 10, United States Code to commissioned officers of the Army (or their beneficiaries). (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2846 aims to amend Title II of the Public Health Service Act, granting commissioned officers of the Public Health Service (and their beneficiaries) the same leave benefits as commissioned officers of the Army (and their beneficiaries) under Title 10, United States Code. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 10, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The amendment involves adding Chapter 40, Leave, to Section 221(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 213a(a)). Additionally, Section 219 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 210-1) is repealed to conform with the changes.
In short, this bill seeks to equalize leave benefits between Public Health Service officers and Army officers, ensuring similar rights and privileges.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of H.R.2846 will be to provide Public Health Service officers with the same leave benefits as Army officers. This change could improve morale and retention within the Public Health Service.
It also simplifies the administration of benefits by aligning the Public Health Service with existing standards for military leave. The repeal of Section 219 ensures consistency within the Public Health Service Act.
Potential Benefits
- Improved Morale: Public Health Service officers will likely experience improved morale due to equitable leave benefits.
- Enhanced Retention: Equalized benefits may encourage officers to remain in the Public Health Service.
- Simplified Administration: Aligning with Title 10 simplifies the administrative processes related to leave.
- Fairness: Ensures that Public Health Service officers receive similar benefits to their counterparts in the Army.
- Attractiveness: May make the Public Health Service a more attractive career option.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Costs: There may be some increased costs associated with providing additional leave benefits, although these are likely to be minimal.
- Administrative Adjustments: Some administrative adjustments may be required to implement the changes.
- Possible Unintended Consequences: While unlikely, there could be unforeseen consequences related to the repeal of Section 219.
Constitutional Alignment
This bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly the provision for the general welfare. By ensuring fair and equitable benefits for Public Health Service officers, the bill supports the well-being of those serving the nation in a public health capacity.
Furthermore, the bill does not infringe upon any specific rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments. It falls within the legislative powers granted to Congress under Article I to provide for the common defense and general welfare.
There is no apparent conflict with the separation of powers or any other constitutional principle.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).