H.R.289 - Supporting All Producers Act of 2025; SAP Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 289, the Supporting All Producers Act of 2025 (SAP Act of 2025), amends the Agricultural Act of 2014 concerning the Acer access and development program. The bill mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to solicit input from maple industry stakeholders regarding research and education priorities. It also extends the program's authorization through 2030.
Expected Effects
The bill will likely lead to more informed grant-making decisions within the Acer program, aligning research and education efforts with the needs of the maple industry. This could result in more effective use of resources and greater support for maple producers. The extension of the program ensures continued support for the industry.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced Industry Input: Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to consult with maple industry stakeholders, ensuring that research and education priorities align with industry needs.
- Extended Program Authorization: Extends the Acer program through 2030, providing long-term stability and support for maple producers.
- Potential for Increased Efficiency: By incorporating industry feedback, the program may allocate resources more efficiently, leading to better outcomes.
- Support for Agricultural Sector: Directly supports a specific segment of the agricultural sector, contributing to its overall viability.
- Promotion of Sustainable Practices: The research and education component may promote sustainable maple production practices.
Potential Disadvantages
- Limited Scope: The bill focuses solely on the maple industry, potentially neglecting other agricultural sectors.
- Potential for Regulatory Burden: Increased consultations could add to the administrative burden of the Department of Agriculture.
- Risk of Industry Capture: Over-reliance on industry input could lead to the program being unduly influenced by specific interests.
- Unclear Metrics for Success: The bill does not specify clear metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of the consultations or the program's overall impact.
- Potential for Inefficient Resource Allocation: If consultations are not properly managed, they could lead to inefficient allocation of resources.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8) of the Constitution, as it aims to support a specific segment of the agricultural sector. Congress has broad authority to legislate in areas that promote the general welfare of the United States. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).