Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.2893 - Buffalo Tract Protection Act (119th Congress)

Summary

H.R.2893, the Buffalo Tract Protection Act, seeks to withdraw approximately 4,288 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in New Mexico from mineral development. The bill aims to protect the surface estate while reserving the mineral estate to the United States. This withdrawal would affect location, entry, and patent under mining laws, as well as disposition under mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws.

Expected Effects

The primary effect of this bill would be to restrict mineral development on the specified land. This could lead to increased conservation of the area's natural resources and potentially enhance its recreational value. However, it could also limit opportunities for mineral extraction and related economic activities.

Potential Benefits

  • Preservation of natural landscapes and ecosystems within the designated area.
  • Potential for increased recreational opportunities, such as hiking and camping.
  • Protection of cultural and historical resources that may be present on the land.
  • Supports long-term environmental sustainability by limiting mineral extraction.
  • May increase property values in surrounding areas due to enhanced natural amenities.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Reduced potential for mineral resource development and associated economic benefits.
  • Possible job losses in the mining and energy sectors.
  • Limits access to resources that could contribute to energy independence.
  • Potential for increased reliance on mineral imports from other countries.
  • May face opposition from industries and individuals with existing mineral rights or interests.

Constitutional Alignment

The bill appears to align with Congress's power to manage federal lands under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States. The Act does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).