H.R.2922 - Hammers' Law (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2922, also known as Hammers' Law, aims to amend Title 46 of the United States Code to allow for nonpecuniary damages in lawsuits resulting from incidents on cruise ship voyages occurring on the high seas. The bill defines key terms such as 'cruise ship' and 'nonpecuniary damages,' clarifying the scope of its application. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 17, 2025, and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill would be to expand the types of damages recoverable in maritime law, specifically for cruise ship passengers. This could lead to increased litigation against cruise lines and potentially higher insurance costs for these companies. Ultimately, this could also affect the pricing of cruise tickets.
Potential Benefits
- Allows for compensation for emotional distress and loss of companionship in cruise ship incidents.
- Provides a legal avenue for victims of negligence on cruise ships to seek more comprehensive damages.
- May incentivize cruise lines to improve safety standards and passenger care to avoid costly lawsuits.
- Clarifies the legal definitions related to cruise ship voyages and nonpecuniary damages.
- Could lead to greater accountability within the cruise ship industry.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could increase the cost of cruise tickets due to higher insurance premiums for cruise lines.
- May lead to frivolous lawsuits, potentially burdening the legal system.
- Could disproportionately benefit plaintiffs with strong emotional claims, regardless of the severity of the incident.
- May create uncertainty in the maritime industry regarding liability and risk management.
- Could potentially lead to cruise lines limiting their operations or routes to avoid areas with higher litigation risks.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article III, Section 2, which extends federal judicial power to cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Congress has the power to regulate maritime commerce and define the scope of remedies available in such cases. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).