H.R.2931 - Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2931, the "Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025," directs the Small Business Administration (SBA) to relocate certain offices located in sanctuary jurisdictions. The bill defines 'sanctuary jurisdiction' as a political subdivision that restricts information sharing with federal authorities regarding immigration status or compliance with DHS detainer requests. The Act mandates relocation within 120 days of a public determination by the Administrator that an office is in a sanctuary jurisdiction.
Expected Effects
The Act aims to ensure SBA offices are not located in areas that hinder federal immigration enforcement efforts. This could lead to the closure or relocation of SBA offices, potentially disrupting services to small businesses in those areas. Non-compliance results in the cessation of operations and reassignment of employees.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces federal immigration enforcement policies.
- Ensures SBA resources are not used in jurisdictions that may obstruct federal law.
- May improve information sharing between local and federal entities regarding immigration matters.
- Could lead to increased compliance with federal detainer requests.
- Potentially strengthens national security by limiting obstruction of immigration enforcement.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Disrupts SBA services to small businesses in sanctuary jurisdictions.
- May negatively impact economic development in affected areas.
- Could lead to job losses or displacement for SBA employees.
- May face legal challenges based on federalism or equal protection grounds.
- Could create a chilling effect on local governments' willingness to cooperate with federal agencies on other matters.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act's constitutionality may be debated under the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states. Opponents might argue that the Act infringes upon states' rights to set their own policies regarding immigration enforcement. Proponents may argue that the Act is justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8) as it relates to enforcing federal immigration laws and ensuring the SBA's effective operation.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).