H.R.3207 - Disabling Enemy Flight Entry and Neutralizing Suspect Equipment Act; DEFENSE Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3207, the DEFENSE Act, aims to enhance security at events with temporary flight restrictions by authorizing the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General to deputize state and local law enforcement officers. These officers would be empowered to take countermeasures against drones posing a threat to locations such as stadiums and other large public gatherings. The bill also mandates training for deputized officers and establishes oversight mechanisms, including a list of authorized equipment for drone detection and countermeasures.
Expected Effects
The bill would expand the authority of state and local law enforcement to address potential drone threats at large public events. This could lead to increased security and a quicker response to unauthorized drone activity. The legislation also formalizes the process for drone countermeasures, including training and equipment authorization.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced security at large public gatherings, reducing the risk of drone-related incidents.
- Clearer guidelines and training for state and local law enforcement regarding drone countermeasures.
- Improved coordination between federal agencies (DHS, DOJ, FAA) and local law enforcement.
- Standardized equipment authorization, ensuring the use of effective and safe technologies.
- Potential for deterring malicious drone activity through increased law enforcement presence.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for overreach by law enforcement in using drone countermeasures.
- Concerns about privacy related to drone detection and monitoring technologies.
- Risk of accidental or unintended consequences from drone countermeasures.
- Costs associated with training and equipping state and local law enforcement.
- Possible legal challenges related to the scope of authority granted to deputized officers.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. It touches on issues related to law enforcement powers, potential impacts on individual privacy (Fourth Amendment), and federal-state relations (Tenth Amendment). The authorization of drone countermeasures could be seen as an extension of law enforcement authority, potentially requiring careful consideration of due process and search and seizure protections. The delegation of authority to state and local officers also raises questions about federal oversight and accountability.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).