H.R.3243 - Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3243, the Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025, aims to prohibit commercial sexual orientation conversion therapy. The bill defines conversion therapy as any practice that seeks to change an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity for monetary compensation. It outlines findings that such therapies are ineffective and harmful, and declares them unlawful.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would make it illegal to provide or advertise conversion therapy for compensation. The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general would be empowered to enforce the law, potentially leading to civil actions against violators.
Potential Benefits
- Protects LGBTQ+ individuals from harmful and ineffective practices.
- Reduces the risk of depression, self-harm, and suicide associated with conversion therapy.
- Prevents financial exploitation of vulnerable individuals and families.
- Reinforces the scientific consensus that LGBTQ+ identities are not disorders.
- Promotes public health and well-being by discouraging harmful practices.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential legal challenges based on First Amendment claims regarding freedom of speech and religious expression.
- Possible overreach by the federal government into areas traditionally regulated by states.
- Concerns about defining the scope of 'conversion therapy' and its impact on legitimate therapeutic practices.
- Risk of unintended consequences for individuals seeking counseling or support related to their sexual orientation or gender identity.
- Potential for increased polarization and division on issues related to LGBTQ+ rights.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is potentially complex. While Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce, some may argue that this bill infringes upon the First Amendment rights of free speech and religious expression. The bill attempts to address this by excluding practices or services protected by the First Amendment. However, the line between protected speech and harmful conduct may be subject to judicial interpretation. The enforcement mechanisms, particularly those involving the FTC, align with established regulatory powers.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).