H.R.3406 - Readiness Over Wokeness Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3406, the "Readiness Over Wokeness Act," seeks to prohibit individuals with gender dysphoria from serving in the Armed Forces. The bill amends Title 10 of the United States Code to prevent those with a current or past diagnosis of gender dysphoria, or a history of gender-affirming care, from serving. It also mandates administrative discharge for current service members who fall under these criteria.
The bill further stipulates that service members discharged under these provisions are not required to reimburse educational benefits or complete service obligations. Additionally, it requires a security clearance reinvestigation for those discharged who previously had access to classified information.
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on May 14, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.3406 would change the composition of the US Armed Forces. It would lead to the discharge of current service members diagnosed with gender dysphoria or who have undergone gender-affirming care.
This could potentially affect military readiness and unit cohesion, depending on the number of service members impacted and the roles they fulfill. The bill may also face legal challenges based on equal protection and discrimination grounds.
Potential Benefits 2/5
- Could potentially reduce healthcare costs associated with gender-affirming care within the military.
- May align military service requirements with traditional notions of physical and mental fitness, according to some perspectives.
- Could prevent potential disruptions in military readiness due to medical treatments or transitions.
- May reinforce specific views on gender and identity within the military culture.
- Could be seen as upholding standards for military service.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to the loss of valuable service members with critical skills and experience.
- May negatively impact morale and unit cohesion by creating a discriminatory environment.
- Could face legal challenges based on equal protection and discrimination grounds.
- May reduce the pool of eligible candidates for military service.
- Could harm the reputation of the military as an inclusive and diverse institution.
Constitutional Alignment 2/5
The constitutional alignment of H.R.3406 is debatable. Arguments against its alignment could be made under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, suggesting that the bill unfairly discriminates against individuals with gender dysphoria.
Proponents might argue for its alignment under the Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to raise and support armies, implying the authority to set military service standards. However, these standards must still comply with constitutional principles of equality and due process.
The First Amendment could also be invoked, concerning freedom of expression and religious freedom, depending on how the bill is interpreted and applied in relation to individual beliefs and practices.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).