H.R.3418 - Historic Preservation Fund Reauthorization Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3418, the Historic Preservation Fund Reauthorization Act, proposes to amend Title 54 of the United States Code to extend funding for the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF). The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on May 14, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources. The key provision of the bill is to extend the HPF's funding through 2035 and increase the authorized funding level to $250,000,000 annually.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.3418 would ensure continued financial support for historic preservation projects across the United States. This would allow for the maintenance, restoration, and protection of historical sites and cultural resources. The increased funding could also stimulate economic activity related to tourism and preservation efforts.
Potential Benefits
- Preservation of Cultural Heritage: Ensures continued funding for the preservation of historic sites and cultural resources.
- Economic Stimulus: Increased funding can lead to job creation in the construction, tourism, and preservation sectors.
- Community Development: Preservation projects can revitalize local communities and enhance their appeal.
- Educational Opportunities: Historic sites provide valuable educational resources for students and the public.
- Increased Tourism: Well-preserved historic sites can attract more tourists, boosting local economies.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased Government Spending: The bill increases authorized spending, which could contribute to budget deficits if not offset by other savings.
- Potential Misallocation of Funds: There is a risk that funds could be directed towards projects of lesser significance or managed inefficiently.
- Opportunity Cost: The funds allocated to historic preservation could potentially be used for other pressing needs, such as infrastructure or education.
- Limited Scope: The bill focuses solely on historic preservation and may not address other important community needs.
- Dependence on Federal Funding: Local communities may become overly reliant on federal funding for preservation efforts, potentially hindering self-sufficiency.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution, as it aims to promote the general well-being of the nation by preserving its cultural heritage. Specifically, the Preamble states the goal to "promote the general Welfare". The bill's focus on preserving historical sites could be interpreted as contributing to the cultural and educational enrichment of the American people. However, the Constitution does not explicitly address historic preservation, so the alignment is indirect.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).