H.R.351 - To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, and for other purposes. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 351 aims to amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, specifically targeting the prohibition of congestion or cordon pricing within value pricing programs. The bill, introduced in the House of Representatives, seeks to prevent the Secretary from establishing or maintaining value pricing programs that include congestion or cordon pricing. This legislative action reflects concerns about the potential impacts of such pricing models on transportation accessibility and affordability.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of H.R. 351, if enacted, would be to restrict the Secretary of Transportation's ability to implement congestion or cordon pricing strategies under existing value pricing programs. This could lead to a reassessment of transportation funding and infrastructure development approaches. It may also lead to alternative methods for managing traffic congestion.
Potential Benefits
- Prevents potential financial burden on commuters through congestion pricing.
- Maintains accessibility to urban areas without additional tolls or fees.
- Could encourage exploration of alternative congestion mitigation strategies.
- Addresses concerns about equity and fairness in transportation funding.
- May reduce the risk of unintended economic consequences from cordon pricing.
Potential Disadvantages
- May limit the flexibility of transportation agencies to address congestion effectively.
- Could reduce potential revenue streams for infrastructure improvements.
- May hinder the implementation of innovative transportation management strategies.
- Could lead to continued or worsening traffic congestion in certain areas.
- May discourage the use of public transportation if driving remains relatively cheaper.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the constitutional principles related to the role of Congress in regulating interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8). The bill does not appear to infringe upon individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, and this bill could be seen as limiting federal influence over state transportation policies.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).