H.R.352 - Motorist Tax Abuse Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.352, the "Motorist Tax Abuse Act," aims to amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. The bill specifically targets and prohibits the implementation of cordon pricing, also known as congestion pricing, within the Central Business District Tolling Program for New York City. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Ms. Malliotakis and referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.352 would prevent the establishment or maintenance of congestion pricing in New York City's Central Business District. This would mean that drivers would not be charged a fee for entering this area, potentially impacting traffic flow and revenue streams intended for transportation infrastructure improvements. The bill's passage would effectively override any existing plans to implement such a tolling system.
Potential Benefits
- Prevents additional financial burden on motorists entering the Central Business District of New York City.
- Could encourage more people to drive into the city, potentially benefiting businesses that rely on customer traffic.
- May alleviate concerns about the fairness of congestion pricing, particularly for lower-income individuals who rely on driving.
- Could lead to a re-evaluation of transportation funding strategies, potentially exploring alternative revenue sources.
- Addresses concerns about the potential negative impacts of congestion pricing on businesses and residents in the affected area.
Potential Disadvantages
- May hinder efforts to reduce traffic congestion in the Central Business District of New York City.
- Could reduce the amount of funding available for transportation infrastructure improvements and maintenance.
- May discourage the use of public transportation, potentially increasing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
- Could lead to increased traffic congestion and delays, negatively impacting businesses and residents.
- May set a precedent for preventing cities from implementing innovative transportation solutions to address congestion and funding challenges.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the general principles of federalism, as it addresses a specific local issue (congestion pricing in New York City). Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce, which could be argued to extend to transportation policies affecting major metropolitan areas. However, the Constitution does not explicitly address transportation policy or congestion pricing. The bill's impact on individual liberties or rights is minimal, and it does not appear to conflict with any specific constitutional provisions.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).