H.R.3554 - Close the Revolving Door Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3554, the "Close the Revolving Door Act of 2025," aims to restrict lobbying activities by former members of Congress and their staff. The bill introduces a lifetime ban on lobbying by former members of Congress and extends the restriction period for congressional staff to six years. It also mandates improved reporting of lobbyists' activities and restricts registered lobbyists from being hired by members or committees of Congress for six years after leaving their lobbying position.
Expected Effects
The bill, if enacted, would likely reduce the influence of special interests in Congress by limiting the ability of former members and staff to immediately lobby their former colleagues. This could lead to more transparency and accountability in the legislative process. The improved reporting requirements would also make it easier for the public to track lobbying activities.
Potential Benefits
- Reduces potential conflicts of interest by restricting former members and staff from lobbying.
- Increases transparency in lobbying activities through improved reporting requirements.
- Limits the influence of special interests in Congress.
- Promotes public trust in government by addressing concerns about the revolving door between Congress and the lobbying industry.
- Creates a more level playing field for those who do not have access to former members and staff.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May restrict the career options of former members of Congress and their staff.
- Could lead to a decrease in the expertise available to Congress on certain issues, as former members and staff may be hesitant to share their knowledge if it could be construed as lobbying.
- The waiver provision in Section 5(c) could be subject to abuse, potentially undermining the effectiveness of the restriction on lobbyists being hired by Congress.
- The definition of "substantial lobbying contact" may be too narrow, allowing some individuals to circumvent the restrictions.
- Could face legal challenges based on First Amendment grounds, arguing that it infringes on the right to free speech and association.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's restrictions on lobbying activities could potentially raise First Amendment concerns regarding freedom of speech and the right to petition the government. However, the government has a legitimate interest in preventing corruption and undue influence in the legislative process. The constitutionality of the bill would likely depend on whether the restrictions are narrowly tailored to serve that interest without unduly burdening First Amendment rights. Article 1, Section 6 addresses compensation and restrictions of members, but does not directly address lobbying after service.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).