H.R.3577 - Eliminate Non-approved Devices and Contraband Electronics Limiting Links to Society Act; END CELLS Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3577, also known as the END CELLS Act, aims to amend the Communications Act of 1934. The bill introduces additional prohibitions and enhanced penalties for providing or possessing wireless communication devices in detention facilities. It targets individuals who provide devices to inmates, facilitate their introduction into facilities, or inmates who possess or attempt to obtain them.
Expected Effects
The bill seeks to reduce the use of contraband cell phones in correctional facilities by increasing the penalties for violations. This could lead to a decrease in criminal activity coordinated from within prisons. It may also impact communication between inmates and their families.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced Safety: Reduces the potential for inmates to coordinate criminal activities both inside and outside the facility.
- Improved Security: Makes it more difficult for inmates to communicate with the outside world without authorization.
- Reduced Crime: Limits the ability of inmates to continue criminal enterprises while incarcerated.
- Fairness: Helps prevent inmates from intimidating witnesses or victims.
- Deterrence: The increased penalties may deter individuals from attempting to introduce contraband devices.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for Overreach: The broad definition of "wireless communications device" could unintentionally impact legitimate communication methods.
- Increased Penalties: The enhanced penalties could be seen as excessive in some cases.
- Enforcement Challenges: Detecting and preventing the introduction of contraband devices remains a significant challenge.
- Impact on Rehabilitation: Restricting communication could hinder rehabilitation efforts for some inmates.
- Cost: Increased enforcement and prosecution efforts could strain resources.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution is generally positive, as it aims to enhance public safety and prevent criminal activity. However, concerns could arise regarding the potential for infringing on inmates' rights to communication, although these rights are already limited due to their incarceration. The bill does not appear to violate any specific constitutional amendments, assuming due process is followed in enforcement.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).