Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.3650 - Federal Gift Shop Tax Act (119th Congress)

Summary

H.R. 3650, the "Federal Gift Shop Tax Act," proposes to allow states to impose sales taxes on purchases made at gift shops located on federal property, including online sales. The bill defines "Federal property" broadly to include buildings, land, and facilities owned or operated by the U.S. government, including institutions like the Smithsonian and the Kennedy Center. The bill aims to generate additional revenue for states by taxing sales within these federal properties.

This legislation could potentially increase state revenue without directly raising federal taxes. The additional revenue could be used to fund various state programs and services.

The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Ms. Norton and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Expected Effects

The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to allow states to collect sales tax on purchases made at gift shops located on federal property. This would likely lead to increased revenue for state governments.

Consumers purchasing items at these gift shops would see an increase in the final price due to the added sales tax. The change could also affect the pricing strategies of the gift shops themselves.

It could also create some administrative overhead for both the gift shops and the state governments to implement and manage the collection and remittance of these taxes.

Potential Benefits

  • Increased State Revenue: States gain additional revenue from sales taxes on federal property gift shop purchases.
  • Funding for State Programs: The additional revenue can be used to fund various state-level programs and services, such as education, infrastructure, or public health.
  • Fairness in Taxation: It levels the playing field between businesses on federal property and those off-federal property, as the latter already collect state sales taxes.
  • Economic Boost for States: Increased revenue can stimulate state economies by allowing for greater investment in public services.
  • Simplified Tax Collection: The bill clearly defines what constitutes a qualifying purchase and federal property, reducing ambiguity in tax collection.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Increased Consumer Costs: Consumers will pay more for goods purchased at federal gift shops due to the added sales tax.
  • Administrative Burden: Gift shops and state governments may face additional administrative burdens in collecting and remitting the sales taxes.
  • Potential for Reduced Sales: Higher prices due to sales tax could potentially reduce sales volume at federal gift shops.
  • Complexity in Implementation: Determining the specific tax rates and collection procedures for each state could be complex, especially for online sales.
  • Possible Legal Challenges: The imposition of state taxes on federal property could potentially face legal challenges based on federal supremacy.

Constitutional Alignment

This bill appears to align with the US Constitution, specifically Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." While this bill doesn't directly levy a federal tax, it permits states to levy a sales tax on federal property, which could be seen as an indirect exercise of Congress's power to regulate commerce and generate revenue.

Furthermore, the Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, and this bill could be interpreted as Congress allowing states to exercise their taxing power within certain federal enclaves. There is no apparent violation of individual rights or liberties as defined in the Bill of Rights.

However, the constitutionality could be challenged based on the Supremacy Clause (Article VI), arguing that state taxation of federal property interferes with federal functions. This would depend on judicial interpretation.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).