H.R.3668 - Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3668, the "Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act," aims to streamline the review process for natural gas pipeline projects by enhancing coordination among federal agencies. The bill designates the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as the lead agency for NEPA reviews related to natural gas pipelines. It also sets deadlines for federal authorizations and promotes concurrent reviews by relevant agencies.
Expected Effects
The bill is likely to expedite the approval and construction of natural gas pipelines by reducing bureaucratic delays and improving interagency communication. This could lead to increased energy infrastructure development. However, it may also reduce the ability of other agencies to conduct independent environmental reviews, potentially leading to negative environmental consequences.
Potential Benefits
- Faster approval times for natural gas pipeline projects.
- Reduced regulatory uncertainty for energy companies.
- Improved coordination among federal agencies.
- Potential for increased investment in energy infrastructure.
- Enhanced energy security through expanded pipeline capacity.
Potential Disadvantages
- Reduced opportunity for other agencies to conduct independent environmental reviews.
- Potential for negative environmental impacts due to expedited project approvals.
- Possible marginalization of state and local concerns in the review process.
- May weaken the application of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
- Could prioritize energy development over environmental protection.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's focus on interstate commerce and energy regulation aligns with the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) of the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or protections. However, some may argue that limiting environmental reviews could potentially conflict with the Ninth Amendment, which protects unenumerated rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).