H.R.3675 - EO 14290 Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3675, the EO 14290 Act of 2025, seeks to codify Executive Order 14290 into law. The bill aims to end taxpayer subsidization of what is deemed "biased media." The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Burchett and Mrs. Luna and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Expected Effects
If enacted, Executive Order 14290 would have the full force of law. This would likely lead to changes in how government funds are allocated to media organizations. The exact impact depends on the interpretation and implementation of the term "biased media."
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces government spending on media outlets perceived as biased.
- Could lead to a more diverse media landscape if subsidies are removed from dominant players.
- May increase public trust in media if perceived bias is reduced.
- Could encourage media outlets to be more objective in their reporting.
- May align government spending with the preferences of taxpayers who object to subsidizing biased media.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Defining "biased media" is subjective and could lead to politically motivated targeting of specific outlets.
- May disproportionately affect smaller or independent media organizations that rely on government funding.
- Could be seen as a violation of the freedom of the press if it unduly restricts government support for media.
- Potential for abuse by future administrations to silence dissenting voices.
- May lead to a less informed public if diverse perspectives are suppressed.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is questionable, particularly concerning the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press. While the government has some discretion over how it spends taxpayer money, targeting media outlets based on perceived bias could be viewed as an infringement on this freedom. The definition of "biased media" would be crucial in determining the bill's constitutionality. Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to spend for the general welfare, could be invoked to justify the bill, but this would need to be balanced against First Amendment concerns.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).