H.R.3693 - To prohibit the Federal Government from establishing or maintaining a database that contains data collected through, or facilitates, the biometric identity verification of a citizen of the United States, and for other purposes. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 3693 aims to prohibit the Federal Government from establishing or maintaining databases containing biometric data of US citizens. The bill defines biometric identity verification as automated recognition based on biological or behavioral characteristics, such as fingerprints, iris patterns, or facial features. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 3, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would prevent federal agencies from creating or using databases that collect and store biometric information for identity verification. This would limit the government's ability to use biometric data for various purposes, potentially impacting law enforcement, national security, and other areas. The bill's impact would largely depend on how broadly the term 'database' is interpreted and the extent to which existing biometric systems rely on centralized databases.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced privacy for US citizens by limiting government collection and storage of biometric data.
- Reduced risk of data breaches and misuse of sensitive biometric information.
- Prevention of potential government overreach in surveillance and tracking of individuals.
- Increased individual control over personal biometric data.
- Reinforcement of constitutional rights related to privacy and freedom from unwarranted surveillance.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential hindrance to law enforcement and national security efforts that rely on biometric identification.
- Reduced efficiency in identifying criminals and preventing terrorist attacks.
- Increased difficulty in verifying identities for government services and benefits.
- Possible delays and complications in border security and immigration processes.
- May limit the development and implementation of innovative technologies that utilize biometric data for public benefit.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with constitutional principles related to individual privacy and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, potentially supported by interpretations of the Fourth Amendment. It also touches upon the broader concept of limited government, as the bill seeks to restrict the federal government's power to collect and maintain sensitive personal data. However, the Constitution does not explicitly address biometric data, leaving room for interpretation and debate regarding the extent of constitutional protection in this area.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).