H.R.375 - Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 375, the Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025, directs the Secretary of the Interior to collaborate with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death (ROD). The bill focuses on sustained efforts in research, ungulate management, and restoration through financial assistance and infrastructure funding. It aims to combat the spread of ROD and restore native forests in Hawaii.
Expected Effects
This act will likely lead to increased research and management efforts to combat Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii. It will also foster collaboration between federal and state agencies. The expected outcome is the preservation of native forests and the mitigation of the disease's impact.
Potential Benefits
- Increased funding for research into Rapid Ohia Death vectors and transmission.
- Improved ungulate management in ROD control areas, protecting vulnerable forests.
- Financial assistance for preventing the spread of ROD and restoring native forests.
- Enhanced collaboration between federal and state agencies, leading to more effective responses.
- Support for the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry to conduct crucial research.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for bureaucratic delays in the implementation of collaborative efforts.
- Dependence on continued funding and resources, which may be subject to future budget constraints.
- Possible conflicts between stakeholders regarding ungulate management strategies.
- Limited scope, focusing primarily on Hawaii and potentially neglecting other regions facing similar threats.
- The effectiveness of the measures is contingent on the accuracy and applicability of the research findings.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution, as it aims to protect the environment and natural resources, specifically in Hawaii. Congress has the power to enact legislation that promotes the general welfare of the United States, including measures to address environmental concerns and support state-level initiatives. The Act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).