H.R.3895 - For the relief of Ivana Alexandra Sifuentes Arbirio. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3895 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives on June 10, 2025, seeking to provide relief to Ivana Alexandra Sifuentes Arbirio by granting her permanent resident status in the United States. The bill specifically addresses waivers for grounds of removal or denial of admission and sets a deadline for application and payment of fees.
It also stipulates a reduction in the number of immigrant visas available to natives of the alien's country of birth and denies preferential immigration treatment for certain relatives.
The bill aims to provide a pathway to legal residency for a specific individual, addressing potential grounds for inadmissibility and removal.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.3895 would allow Ivana Alexandra Sifuentes Arbirio to become a lawful permanent resident of the United States, bypassing certain standard immigration procedures.
This would involve adjusting the overall number of immigrant visas available and potentially rescinding any existing removal orders against her. The bill would not extend immigration benefits to her relatives.
The immediate effect is focused on the individual named in the bill, with minor adjustments to the overall immigration visa allocation process.
Potential Benefits
- Provides a pathway to legal residency for Ivana Alexandra Sifuentes Arbirio, potentially allowing her to live and work in the U.S. without fear of deportation.
- Rescinds any outstanding removal orders, offering her a clean slate under U.S. immigration law.
- May offer a sense of justice or fairness in specific cases where standard immigration procedures might not adequately address individual circumstances.
- Could be seen as an act of compassion by some, reflecting positively on the U.S. immigration system in isolated cases.
- Streamlines the process for this individual, potentially reducing administrative burden on immigration courts and agencies.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Sets a precedent for individual relief bills, which could be perceived as unfair to others seeking legal residency through standard channels.
- Reduces the number of immigrant visas available to others, albeit by a small amount (one visa), potentially delaying or preventing their immigration.
- Could be seen as circumventing established immigration laws and procedures, undermining the integrity of the system.
- May encourage others to seek similar individual relief through legislative means, potentially overwhelming Congress with such requests.
- Could raise concerns about potential abuse or fraud if not carefully scrutinized, although the bill includes specific conditions and limitations.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The Constitution grants Congress the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4). While this bill addresses immigration, it does so for a specific individual, which raises questions about whether it aligns with the principle of uniform application of laws.
The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech or religion (Amendment I). However, the potential for unequal treatment under the law could be a concern.
Overall, the bill's constitutionality is debatable, depending on the interpretation of Congress's power over naturalization and the principle of equal protection.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).