H.R.3929 - Giving Alien Migrants Back through Lawful Excise Redistribution Act; GAMBLER Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3929, the GAMBLER Act, proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a Border Enforcement Trust Fund. This fund would be dedicated to financing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations related to enforcement, detention, and removal of undocumented immigrants. The bill aims to allocate taxes received under chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code to this trust fund.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the GAMBLER Act would create a dedicated funding stream for border enforcement activities. This could lead to increased resources for ICE, potentially resulting in more apprehensions, detentions, and deportations. The Act also seeks to shield average American citizens from bearing the financial burden of these operations.
Potential Benefits
- Dedicated funding for border enforcement.
- Potential reduction in the financial burden on taxpayers for immigration enforcement.
- Increased resources for ICE operations.
- May lead to a decrease in illegal immigration.
- Addresses concerns about the cost of supporting undocumented immigrants.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased enforcement activities that may impact immigrant communities.
- The source of funding (chapter 35 taxes) and its impact on other areas is not specified, potentially creating budgetary conflicts.
- May lead to increased detention and deportation, raising human rights concerns.
- Could face legal challenges related to immigration enforcement policies.
- The effectiveness of the fund in achieving its stated goals is uncertain.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Congress has broad authority over immigration under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4, which grants the power to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization. The creation of a trust fund and allocation of resources are within Congress's power of the purse (Article I, Section 9, Clause 7). However, the implementation of enforcement activities must adhere to due process and equal protection principles under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The potential for increased detention and deportation raises concerns about due process rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).