H.R.3984 - Expedited Removal Expansion Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3984, the Expedited Removal Expansion Act of 2025, aims to amend Section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The bill seeks to remove certain exceptions related to the inspection of applicants for admission, specifically targeting those who might otherwise be exempt from expedited removal processes. It eliminates considerations for individuals described in subparagraph (F) of the existing law and modifies the criteria for inadmissibility determinations.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is a broader application of expedited removal procedures. This would lead to quicker deportations for a larger group of non-citizens. The bill also removes the requirement for immigration officers to consider continuous physical presence in the US for a two-year period when determining inadmissibility.
Potential Benefits 2/5
- Enhanced border security by streamlining the removal process.
- Reduced burden on immigration courts by expediting certain cases.
- Discouragement of illegal immigration due to stricter enforcement.
- Potential cost savings from reduced detention periods.
- Increased efficiency in processing immigration cases.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased risk of wrongful deportations due to limited due process.
- Potential violation of international agreements regarding asylum seekers.
- Negative impact on communities with large immigrant populations.
- Strain on diplomatic relations with countries whose citizens are affected.
- Erosion of individual rights and liberties for non-citizens.
Constitutional Alignment 2/5
The bill's constitutional alignment is questionable, particularly concerning the Fifth Amendment's due process clause. While Congress has broad authority over immigration, the extent to which expedited removal can be expanded without adequate due process is a matter of legal debate. The bill's impact on asylum seekers also raises concerns about compliance with international treaty obligations, which could be argued to fall under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).