H.R.4021 - Patriotism Not Pride Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.4021, the "Patriotism Not Pride Act," seeks to prohibit the use of federal funds for activities promoting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex (LGBTQI+) Pride Month. It also restricts the display of flags representing sexual orientation or gender identity on federal property. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 17, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would significantly curtail federal recognition and support for LGBTQI+ Pride Month and related symbols. Federal agencies would be barred from organizing or promoting any activities related to LGBTQI+ Pride Month. The display of pride flags on federal property would also be prohibited.
Potential Benefits 2/5
- Potentially aligns with the views of individuals who believe federal resources should not be used to promote specific social or cultural movements.
- May be seen as a way to ensure neutrality on federal property regarding sensitive social issues.
- Could reduce perceived government endorsement of specific ideologies.
- May be viewed as upholding traditional values by some segments of the population.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be perceived as discriminatory towards the LGBTQI+ community, potentially leading to feelings of marginalization and exclusion.
- May negatively impact the morale and well-being of LGBTQI+ federal employees.
- Could be seen as a violation of free speech and expression rights.
- May harm the United States' reputation as a champion of human rights and equality on the international stage.
Constitutional Alignment 2/5
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Proponents might argue it aligns with principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility. Opponents could argue that it violates the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech and expression, as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by singling out a specific group for differential treatment. The Establishment Clause might also be invoked, depending on interpretations of government neutrality.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).