H.R.4046 - Cybersecurity in Agriculture Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 4046, the Cybersecurity in Agriculture Act of 2025, aims to enhance cybersecurity within the agricultural sector. It directs the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program for Agriculture Cybersecurity Centers. These centers will focus on research, development, and education related to cybersecurity in agriculture.
Expected Effects
The Act will likely lead to the creation of regional cybersecurity centers. These centers will develop and implement cybersecurity measures tailored to the agriculture industry. It should also improve the sector's resilience against cyber threats.
Potential Benefits
- Improved cybersecurity for agricultural infrastructure and supply chains.
- Development of specialized cybersecurity tools and technologies for the agriculture sector.
- Enhanced training and education for agricultural stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices.
- Creation of a network for collaboration and information sharing on cybersecurity threats.
- Increased resilience of the agricultural sector against cyberattacks, protecting food production and supply.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies in establishing and managing the cybersecurity centers.
- Risk of funding being misallocated or used for purposes other than intended.
- Possible challenges in coordinating activities across different regional centers.
- The cost of $25 million per year for five years may be considered substantial by some.
- The effectiveness of the centers will depend on the quality of research and training provided.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly the General Welfare Clause (Preamble). It promotes the general welfare by protecting a critical sector of the economy from cyber threats. The establishment of these centers falls under Congress's power to regulate commerce and provide for the common defense by securing the food supply chain.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).