H.R.4054 - Accreditation Choice and Innovation Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 4054, the Accreditation Choice and Innovation Act, aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reform accreditation processes for institutions of higher education. The bill introduces changes to accrediting agency recognition, secretarial requirements, operating procedures, and definitions related to accreditation. It also addresses religious institutions and risk-based review processes.
Expected Effects
The bill is likely to increase flexibility and choice in accreditation, potentially leading to greater innovation in higher education. It may also enhance accountability and transparency in accreditation processes, while providing additional protections for religious institutions. However, it could also lead to inconsistencies in accreditation standards and oversight.
Potential Benefits 3/5
- Increased flexibility for institutions to choose accrediting agencies.
- Enhanced focus on student achievement outcomes and labor market outcomes.
- Greater protection for religious institutions' missions and values.
- Streamlined accreditation processes for agencies with proven track records.
- More transparent and risk-based review processes.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for inconsistent accreditation standards across different agencies.
- Increased administrative burden for states and the Secretary of Education.
- Possible credential inflation due to relaxed accreditation requirements.
- Risk of reduced oversight and quality control in some institutions.
- Uncertainty regarding the impact of new definitions and requirements.
Constitutional Alignment 4/5
The bill's focus on education falls under the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as education is often viewed as promoting the general welfare. The provisions related to religious institutions also touch upon the First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom. However, the Constitution does not explicitly address accreditation, leaving Congress with broad authority to legislate in this area under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to citizens. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).