H.R.456 - Protecting Dogs Subjected to Experiments Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.456, the "Protecting Dogs Subjected to Experiments Act," aims to prohibit the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from using federal funds for biological, medical, or behavioral research involving the testing of dogs. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Steube and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill consists of a short title and a single section that outlines the prohibition.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would prevent the NIH from funding research projects that involve testing on dogs. This could lead to a reduction in certain types of biomedical research. Alternative research methods may be explored and funded instead.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces animal suffering.
- May encourage the development of alternative research methods.
- Aligns with ethical concerns regarding animal welfare.
- Could lead to increased public trust in research institutions.
- May free up funds for other research areas.
Potential Disadvantages
- May hinder medical advancements that rely on animal models.
- Could increase the cost or complexity of research.
- May limit the scope of research on certain diseases.
- Potential job losses in research facilities that conduct dog testing.
- May delay the development of new treatments and therapies.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to fall within the legislative powers granted to Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which allows Congress to provide for the general welfare and regulate commerce. The allocation of federal funds is a power explicitly granted to Congress. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or freedoms.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).