Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.466 - Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act (119th Congress)

Summary

H.R. 466, the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act, mandates that the Secretary of Energy must secure consent from affected state and local governments, including Indian tribes, before allocating funds from the Nuclear Waste Fund for establishing a nuclear waste repository. This consent must be formalized through written agreements that are binding and can only be altered with mutual consent.

The bill aims to give more control to local communities over the placement of nuclear waste repositories. It directly affects how the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 is implemented.

The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 15, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Expected Effects

The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to require the Department of Energy to obtain explicit consent from relevant state, local, and tribal governments before proceeding with any nuclear waste repository project.

This could potentially slow down or halt the development of new repositories if consent is not granted. It would also shift more power to state and local entities in decisions regarding nuclear waste disposal.

Potential Benefits

  • Increased Local Control: Empowers state and local governments, including Indian tribes, to have a direct say in whether a nuclear waste repository is located within their jurisdiction.
  • Environmental Protection: Ensures that local environmental concerns are addressed and considered before a repository is established.
  • Community Well-being: Protects the well-being of communities by giving them the power to reject projects that they believe could negatively impact their health and safety.
  • Informed Decision-Making: Promotes more informed decision-making by requiring the Secretary of Energy to engage with and obtain consent from affected communities.
  • Reduced Risk of Imposition: Reduces the risk of the federal government imposing unwanted nuclear waste facilities on unwilling communities.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Project Delays: Could significantly delay or halt the development of needed nuclear waste repositories, potentially leading to storage issues at existing nuclear facilities.
  • Increased Costs: The negotiation and consent process could increase the costs associated with establishing a repository.
  • Potential for NIMBYism: May empower local opposition to block projects that are in the national interest, even if they are environmentally sound.
  • Legal Challenges: The consent-based approach could lead to legal challenges and disputes over what constitutes adequate consent.
  • Uneven Implementation: Different states and localities may have varying standards for consent, leading to inconsistent implementation of nuclear waste policy.

Constitutional Alignment

The bill's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. While the Constitution grants the federal government authority over interstate commerce and nuclear regulation, the Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states and the people. This bill could be seen as an attempt to balance federal authority with states' rights by requiring state and local consent.

There is no specific clause directly addressing nuclear waste disposal consent. However, arguments could be made that forcing a state to accept nuclear waste without consent infringes upon its sovereignty. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, which could be interpreted to include the transportation and disposal of nuclear waste. This power is, however, not unlimited and must be balanced against the principles of federalism.

Ultimately, the constitutionality of the Act would likely depend on judicial interpretation of the balance between federal power and state sovereignty.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).