H.R.632 - Protecting Life on College Campus Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 632, the "Protecting Life on College Campus Act of 2025," aims to prohibit federal funding to institutions of higher education that host or are affiliated with student-based service sites providing abortion drugs or abortions. The bill requires institutions to submit annual reports certifying that no such services are provided to students or employees to remain eligible for federal funds. The bill defines key terms like "abortion drug" and "school-based service site" to clarify the scope of the prohibition.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is a reduction in access to abortion drugs and abortions for students and employees at institutions of higher education that receive federal funding. This could lead to changes in healthcare services offered on college campuses. It may also force some institutions to choose between providing these services and receiving federal funds.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the number of abortions performed.
- May align with the moral or religious beliefs of some individuals.
- Could lead to increased funding for alternative services, such as prenatal care, if institutions redirect resources.
- Could be seen as protecting unborn children.
- May encourage students to make different lifestyle choices.
Potential Disadvantages
- Restricts access to healthcare options for students and employees, particularly those with limited resources.
- May disproportionately affect low-income individuals and students in rural areas.
- Could lead to unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions.
- Potentially infringes on individual autonomy and reproductive rights.
- May create administrative burdens for institutions to comply with reporting requirements.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex and contested. Supporters may argue it aligns with the government's interest in protecting potential life. Opponents may argue it infringes upon individual liberties and reproductive rights, potentially raising questions under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The bill does not appear to directly violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause or Free Exercise Clause.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).