H.R.681 - To amend the Act of August 9, 1955 (commonly known as the Long-Term Leasing Act), to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), and for other purposes. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.681 proposes amending the Long-Term Leasing Act to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). The bill aims to grant these tribes greater control and potential economic benefit from their lands. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 23, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Expected Effects
If passed, H.R. 681 would allow the Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) to enter into longer-term leases for their trust lands. This could lead to increased economic development opportunities for the tribes. The change would provide more flexibility in land management and potentially attract more substantial investment.
Potential Benefits
- Increased tribal revenue through long-term leases.
- Greater self-determination for the tribes in managing their lands.
- Potential for economic development and job creation within the tribal communities.
- Attracts more substantial investment due to longer lease terms.
- Enhanced ability to plan and develop long-term projects on tribal lands.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for exploitation of tribal lands if leases are not carefully negotiated.
- Risk of environmental damage if development is not properly regulated.
- Possible conflicts between tribal members regarding land use decisions.
- Could lead to loss of control over land if lease terms are unfavorable.
- May exacerbate existing social or economic disparities within the tribes if benefits are not distributed equitably.
Constitutional Alignment
This bill appears to align with the federal government's trust responsibility to Native American tribes, which has been recognized through various Supreme Court decisions and federal laws. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention Native American affairs, the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) has been interpreted to grant Congress broad authority over Indian affairs. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).